Husband and wife both employed with the govt ?
Then you must read this.
Thanks
Friday, February 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Feel free to contribute on burning issues concerning the armed forces. Contributions would be acknowledged - Use the 'Comments' tab or email navdeepsingh.india[at]gmail.com. No operational/business/commercial matters to be discussed please. Legal advice/litigation related issues would strictly NOT be published or discussed or entertained. Information on this blog is opinion based and is neither official nor in the form of an advice. This is a pro bono online journal in public service related to issues, policies and benefits, and the idea behind it is to educate and not to create controversy or to incite. Be soft in your language, respect Copyrights.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(128)
-
▼
February
(12)
- DoPT reins in other Ministries
- Some new orders for PSU absorbees
- Why the Annexures ?
- Working couples…
- Reverse Pay Commission
- Union Home Secretary gives props to officership of...
- Serving Major pays for his life while engaging mis...
- All Lt Cols authorised residential telephone
- Govt becomes more proactive : implements proper gu...
- A slight amendment
- Don’t buy this theory
- Major Subir Raha is no more
-
▼
February
(12)
Labels
- Policy and Benefits (368)
- law (296)
- Misc (257)
- Pay Commission (250)
- Pension (184)
- Disability Pension (108)
- Status (105)
- Red-Tapism (78)
- Grade Pay (75)
- Publication (63)
- AFT (61)
- RTI (30)
- guest post (29)
- Warrant of Precedence (26)
- Q and A (16)
- Territorial Army (12)
- Deals for Faujis (11)
- Other Armies (11)
- toll tax (11)
- Income Tax (5)
- Forces Law Gazette (3)
8 comments:
Can Maj Navdeep guide us regarding future course of action in r/o nonclaimant of CEA claim in r/o our children studying in KV School? CDA has returned our claims in the pretext that charges under the heading "VIDYALYA VIKAS NIDHI" are not admissible, vide GOI letter dt Feb 2009, and KV School is not giving monthly tution fee cert, but charging monthly tution fees as "VIDYALYA VIKAS NIDHI" charges, thus depriving us of our legitimate CEA claims.Maj Navdeep pl guide us regarding future coure of action.
Posting Husband and wife together in a station will meet all the aims as specified in the letter. However will our M S Branch be also moved my this reasonable suggestion.Here the general feeling is that if a person is posted to his or her desired place even if suites the organisation it should not be done because then the person will not work.
Dear Maj Navdeep,
We are a both in Army and married for the past 15 yrs. Though, we managed to stay together so far, our org made us sweat and cry for at least 4-6 months every time and ultimately we need to apch someone higher up for getting it done.
Please clarify whether we can quote this letter a an auth in future? And if it is denied on Adm grounds (as always being done), what is the way out? Whom should we go and cry?
Thanx for the very useful lifeline document.
what crime those officers have done whose wives are not working in indian army.
all offrs should be treated n terms equally whether women or men in terms of postings to siachin /sopore/peace station
They can also be posted to Siachen/sopore, but post them together.That's all.
Maj navdeep,
We seem to have forgotten issue of status vis a vis civilian counterparts altogether. Is it possible for u to throw some light on -
status of high powered committee constituted for the purpose.
reasons for non implementation of non functional upgradation like for gp A services for defence services.
Can a comparative table giving monetary benefits received by civilian gp A officers wef 01 jan 06 on account of non functional upgradation to the same scale after two years after promotion of any one in any gp A service be given and the effect on their pay hereafter vis vis defence service officers due to this non functional upgradation.
"VIDYALYA VIKAS NIDHI" update for CEA claim:
It is authorised for CEA claim vide GOI MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PG AND PENSIONS LETTER NO12011/16/2009 - (allowance)dated 13 NOV 2009, as intimated by KVSKOLKATA.ORG email: KVSKOLKATA@YAHOO.CO.IN 033-23376998, KV sangathan, Regional Office, Kolkata, EB Block, Sector-1, Laboni, SaltLake, Kol-700064, Letter no: 25072(6)/09-KVS (KOL)6472-6531 dated 02 Dec 2009 "Children Education Allowance/Hostel Subsidy:Regarding, in ref to KVS(HQ) Letter no:F 110239/51/CIR/2009-KVS(Budget) dated 24 Nov 2009.
....IT IS CLARFIED THAT VIDAYALAYA VIKAS NIDHI CHARGED BY KENDRIYA VIDYALAYAS WILL ALSO FORM PART OF PARA 1 (E) OF THE SAID OM AND CAN BE CLAIMED FOR REIMBURSEMENT UNDER THE SCHEME OF CEA SUBJECT TO ANNUAL CEILING OF RS 12000 PER CHILD"....
dear Maj Navdeep,
My wife is an employee of Air India And is based at Mumbai. I have applied for a choice posting to Ms branch bu t have been straight away refused quoting no reason. I have just finished almost 3 yrs in Rashtria Rifles. i have a small 1 yr old kid to look after and my wife 's job doesn't permit that. Coul u pl help whetheer this lettr can be quoted as auth for getting spouse posting. I guess Air India comes under PSU?
Post a Comment