The Hon’ble Supreme Court
has rendered yet another detailed landmark judgement on pensionary matters on 17 January
2013.
The SC has once again
held that there can be no cut-off dates in pensionary matters, in the sense
that two sets of retirees cannot be treated differently without there being a
just objective.
In the instant case, the
SC has held that the observation of the Division Bench of the High Court which
had dismissed the pensioners’ petitions stating that retirees retiring after a
particular cut-off date were only getting “a little higher” pension, was
clearly not in order.
This is how the SC has
dealt with the above:-
“…First and foremost, it needs to be understood
that the quantum of discrimination is irrelevant to a challenge based on a plea of
arbitrariness, under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Article
14 of the Constitution of India ensures to all, equality before the law
and equal protection of the laws. The question is of arbitrariness
and discrimination. These rights flow to an individual under
Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The extent
of benefit or loss in such a
determination is irrelevant and inconsequential. The
extent to which a benefit or loss actually affects the person concerned,
cannot ever be a valid justification for a court in either granting or
denying the claim raised on these counts. The rejection of the claim
of the appellants by the High Court, merely on account of the belief that
the carry home pension for employees who would retire after 1.6.1988, would
be trivially lower than those retiring prior thereto, amounts to bagging the
issue pressed before the High Court….”
The SC has struck down
the cut-off date of 01-06-1988 which obviously results in grant of full and equal
benefits with arrears with effect from 01-06-1988 to the affected pensioners.
8 comments:
Navdeep
Does it mean that "ONE RANK ONE PENSION" both for civilians and Armed Forces is not far off.
Col Pardaman Singh
Maj Navdeep,
Should it resolve the discrimination
between-
1.pre and post 2006 PENSIONERS
2.pre and post AVC I...LT COL (TS)/S
with 26 years of service vis-a vis
COL (TS) pensions
3.Pre and post 1-1-06 re-employment
officers remunerations
Hope MOD issues much needed orders
on the above issues.
Dear Maj Navdeep,
Will this judgement have an impact on 6th pay commission , 1/1/2006, before and after?
Regards,
Col GD Misra
This is most educative. Now is probably the most opportune moment for Maj Navdeep to advise all affected, and I know quite a few who are, about the implications, if any, of the judgement, specifically on the pre post AVS-I anomalies as mentioned at paras 4 & 5 of this blog post.
This crucifies the discriminatory and obdurate attitude of the Departments/ its Lower and other associated Higher Functionaries of the bureau sufficiently and they must see the deeply entrenched justice in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution before perpetrating such repetetive practices! May the almighty endow them with a better understanding - as they also one day will become PENSIONERS in the same system.
The basic crux of HSC judgement under reference is that an (artificial) division, among equals, can not be created based on flimsy unjustifiable grounds, in respect of their pension entitlement.
If such grounds are based on DA/DP as in instant case, then it should also hold true in case MOD tries to create similar divisions based on RP for pre/post 1986, 1996 or 2006 retirees.
To my mind this judgement takes us closer to justify our demand of OROP i.e. to allow same pension irrespective of point of time at which an officer (of same rank with same qualifying service) retires.
Therefore, Sqn Ldr Selaraj is quite right to that extant. It is good to be alert and be positive at the same time.
Let legal team of RODA ponder upon it and adopt suitable course of action.
Will this judgement or any other help all those whose previously granted pension of 1st service is more than that of combined pension of two services
EX JWO ASHOK
the iesm is non functional now. no updates in the web sites
joe
Post a Comment