On
dismissal of the SLP filed by the Central Government against the judgement of
the Madras High Court, the Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare of the
Government of India has issued orders for all similarly placed employees
finally undoing more than four decades of patent injustice.
In the 1970s, Government
employees who opted to join Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) or autonomous
bodies were made entitled to a payment of lumpsum amount in lieu of pension
that had accrued from their Government Service. In terms of Rule 37-A of the
Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 (added in 1973), an employee was
entitled to a lump sum amount not exceeding the commuted value of one-third of
the pension and terminal benefit equal to twice the aforesaid lump-sum amount,
subject to the condition that the Government servant surrendered his right of
drawing two-thirds of his pension.
Later, on the directions of
the Supreme Court, orders were issued to restore 1/3rd pension after
the period of commutation culminated.
An employee however
approached the Central Administrative Tribunal stating therein that even the
rest of the 2/3rd portion needed to be restored on culmination of
the period of commutation since the undertaking taken under Rule 37-A was in
contravention to provisions of Section 12 of the Pension Act, 1871, which
provided that a person could not be made to wish away his right to pension by
any authority. The petition filed by the employee was however dismissed by the
Tribunal.
The order of the Tribunal
was then challenged by the employee, K Ganesan, in the Madras High Court, which
ruled in his favour and held that the undertaking
taken from the employee was repugnant of the Pensions Act and the 2/3rd
commuted amount also needed to be restored after expiry of the period of commutation.
The Madras High Court directed the Government to do the needful and set aside
the order of the Tribunal. The High Court also observed that the earlier
decisions of the Supreme Court were not on this point and neither were the provisions
of the Pensions Act brought to the knowledge of the Supreme Court. The High
Court however refused to grant interest on the arrears in view of the major
delay in challenging the provisions of the Rules by the employee.
The Central Government
thereafter went into appeal to the Supreme Court but the SLP was dismissed in
2016. The Government thereafter filed a Review which was also dismissed in
March 2017.
The Government has now
issued orders implementing the decision for all similarly placed employees thereby
directing the release of 100% pension from the date of culmination of the
period of 15 years from commutation. As a result, all such PSU/Autonomous
bodies absorbees shall be entitled to 100% restoration of pension on the date
of completion of 15 years from the date of commutation. All such employees
would now be entitled to full arrears from the 4th, 5th,
6th and the 7th Pay Commissions, as the case may be.
Again, this case shows as to
how the above proactive approach of the Department of Pension & Pensioners’Welfare is in contrast with the approach of Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare
under the Ministry of Defence. While even single-liner judgements and orders of
the High Courts and the Supreme Court are implemented across the board for all
similarly placed employees/pensioners by the former, the latter does not even
implement decisions for specific petitioners unless multiple litigation is indulged
in, including contempt and execution applications.
No comments:
Post a Comment